Discovery Questions
- •Does the organization have a written AI adoption strategy with clear use-case boundaries?
- •How are AI tools evaluated before broad rollout (pilots, evals, metrics)?
- •What guardrails prevent teams from shipping unreviewed AI-generated code or content?
- •How is AI tool spend tracked, attributed, and optimized?
- •Is there a responsible AI policy covering bias, hallucination, and data privacy?
- •How are AI capability gaps identified and addressed through training?
- •What feedback loops exist to measure whether AI tools are improving outcomes?
Evidence to Collect
- •AI adoption policy or strategy document.
- •Pilot results and eval scorecards.
- •AI spend dashboards.
- •Training or enablement materials.
Implementation Patterns
AI Center of Excellence (CoE)
Stand up a lightweight CoE to own AI strategy, evaluate tools, and share patterns across teams.
Internal WikiSlack/TeamsOKR Tooling
Steps
- Define CoE charter: scope, membership, decision rights, and cadence.
- Maintain an AI tools registry with adoption status, cost, and use cases.
- Publish and iterate on AI usage guidelines and acceptable-use policies.
- Run quarterly AI retrospectives: what worked, what was wasteful, what to cut.
- Track AI ROI metrics: developer velocity delta, incident MTTR, test coverage gains.
Responsible AI & Governance Framework
Encode ethics, safety, and accountability into every AI initiative from the start.
NIST AI RMFEU AI ActInternal Policy
Steps
- Define data classification rules for what can be sent to external LLM APIs.
- Implement output review gates before AI-generated artifacts reach production.
- Require human approval for any agentic action with destructive side-effects.
- Log all AI API calls for auditability and cost attribution.
- Run bias and hallucination audits on models used in decision-making workflows.